Understandably, given that QAF wasn’t technically ON the TV yesterday, a critique of it here could be construed as a little self-righteous – but then, that’s me all over. Besides, I’m quite keen on channeling my 1999-era self to try and form some sort of opinion about the darned show, albeit with the added insight of now being older, wiser, and having rewatched it with a virgin-viewer.
You see, given that Sofa is of a certain age and is living with a gay man for the first time in her life, she has never seen QAF before; and given that I am a gay man of a certain age, I of course own the Definite Collector’s Edition of QAF: As such, we decided to settle down and watch it, episode by episode, night by night.
By this point we had got beyond the licking (Sofa struggled there), and beyond the obvious paedophilic connotations of Stuart and Nathan’s frisson in the early episodes, to come to the conclusion of the series.
In a separate telephone conversation with a gay friend (would we call him a friend?) mid-disc, I got into something of a discussion about whether QAF was a reasonable depiction of modern gay life. I like to think I made quite a sensible, valid argument in its favour. I will try and reconstruct this here:
“Surely the point is that it’s actually a very tongue in cheek (or arse) look at modern living, irrespective of homosexuality or not. The point is: Russell T Davis created a story about these characters: and its kind of irrelevant that they’re gay men at all. It’s a love story, at its core, between Vince and Stuart, the fact that they are two men – one a lovelorn supermarket worker, the other a sex-obsessed, rampant ad man – doesn’t really matter.
“The gay thing is actually just another level to the whole plot, a nod to the fact that some-10 years ago, when it first aired, there was such a distinct lack of gay characters in mainstream TV that this show was always going to be viewed as a portrayal of gay culture as whole. As such, the show is openly littered with stereotypes: the slut (Stuart), the closeted man at work (Vince), the camp guy (Alexander), the young boy exploding out of the closet (Nathan)… The reality is, it doesn’t matter that these characters are gay men: we all feel the same pride, exultation, embarrassment, horror and heartache that love brings.”
I found my point being clarified by the conversation that followed with Sofa: When QAF first aired I was 15 (FIFTEEN!), in the 10 years since I have been Stuart, I have been Vince, I have been Nathan, I have been Alexander, I have even been Hazel and Bernard and Donna and Romy. Fuck. “That’s alright. So have I”, said Sofa.
Part two of our evening’s entertainment was taken up by watching an 82-year-old doddery old codger walk around in the blistering sun in a failed attempt to remain an entertaining spectacle of yesteryear. Sadly, this wasn’t the case because we were looking out of our front window at the mad old bitch who lives across the road, but because we were watching Channel 4’s Living With Brucie.
The facts: Bruce Forsyth is a television icon, and Strictly Come Dancing quite frankly makes my little gay life complete. But my word he is old. So pre-programmed to the television style of years gone by, and so used to rehearsing before stepping out into the spotlight, the concept of a documentary left Brucie bamboozled, befuddled and downright confused.
In fact at times he just looked like that old man who lived in the nursing home with my grandmother, happy to sit and do not much at all.
From sprinkling blueberries into his porridge to ensure there was sufficient space between them (“What’s the point of having blueberries if they are all going to be in one big clump?”), to bombing around Puerto Rica in a golf buggy hell-bent on either crashing or severely offending the security officers at his holiday home complex, Bruce essentially came across as any regular OAP. The only difference being that, with a camera in front of him, he was determined to be the Showman.
Throughout the documentary, Bruce’s confused face continued to ask the filmmaker what he wanted him to do, where he should stand: and at one cringe-inducing moment, dear Brucie even planned what he was going to talk about with his (wonderful) wife Winnie as the pair walked up to camera.
While the documentary was certainly an interesting support to the debate from the end of last year (about whether Brucie really should still be fronting Saturday night live television, or whether he should retire), it failed to do much else. Winnie, meanwhile, came out trumps, proving to be a loving, supporting and downright patient woman: albeit while looking a bit like a carer for her dear old husband.
The saddest bit of all, however, happened in our own house when I turned to Sofa and said, “You know, I think if he did stop he’d just drop dead”. “I think you’re right,” came the response.
The reason this was so utterly devastating? (Aside from the obvious fact it was speculating the death of Bruce Fucking Forsyth) Well, it made the two of us realize that the same thing probably applied to us: only with us, we wouldn’t die if we stopped hosting light entertainment shows in front of millions of viewers but if we stopped drinking. So, where’s my gin?